The 1099s:
Quick background:
I didn't vote for Obama in 2008 because I did my homework and gathered what information there was about the man. There wasn't much, but there was his Senate record which was abysmal, his lack of private sector experience (something every candidate should have under his belt) and lack of any military experience (I rate this least only because people like Kerry go into the service solely because of future political aspirations, not to fight for the cause of preserving freedom). Don't misunderstand me, those that have served have my deepest well-deserved admiration and respect.
Now to the point:
It was April 27, 2011, and I was sitting at my desk and as usual checked out the Drudge Report. There was an announcement Obama was about to make about his birth certificate -- he was going to release his long form birth certificate for all to see. Now my expertise is in graphics, and having common sense, I had good reason to believe Obama wouldn't dare try to pull a fast one on the American public, after all, there are forensic and graphic experts all across America. Up to this date I had not looked into this issue
Shocked beyond belief:
Obama made his speech mocking those who questioned his birth certificate, and the White House put an image of his long form birth certificate online. I wanted a look. I downloaded it immediately and perused it.
Shock doesn't begin to describe my reaction. Immediately, and I mean immediately I could see it was a cut and paste job. And as everyone knows, a cut and paste job would be laughable as proof of anything. So why did Obama announce this constituted proof? I knew that within days Obama would be laughed out of the running for the 2012 election.
Here's the video I put online only hours after Obama made the announcement that his long form birth certificate was put online and available to everyone via a whitehouse.gov website.
Shock doesn't begin to describe my reaction. Immediately, and I mean immediately I could see it was a cut and paste job. And as everyone knows, a cut and paste job would be laughable as proof of anything. So why did Obama announce this constituted proof? I knew that within days Obama would be laughed out of the running for the 2012 election.
Here's the video I put online only hours after Obama made the announcement that his long form birth certificate was put online and available to everyone via a whitehouse.gov website.
Countless forensic experts and graphics professionals would tell the truth, and that would be the end of Obama. I wondered at Obama's thinking... why would he put such an obvious piece of trash on the internet for all to see? Did he actually think he could get away with this? Realizing Obama must have some next move in mind to explain away this online joke, I put up a second video in an attempt to thwart Obama's next move, which I figured was explaining how the original was somehow destroyed, so we'd just have to believe from then on.... his word against the world. In my video I explained Obama's only move would be that a "dog ate the homework" excuse, and how that works once, and that once was all Obama needed.
But then the days rolled by, and silence... and more silence... I couldn't understand this! I'm very good at graphics, yes, but there are literally hundreds who are at least as competent as myself. Where were they? Why aren't we hearing from them? And where were the forensics experts? The media uses graphics experts all day long, so why weren't we hearing from the media about this laughable online cut and paste job? Day after day passed. And nothing. Absolutely nothing.
Now my two online videos exposing the fraud were receiving comments in support of Obama and accusing me of being a racist. I just replied with the facts. They in turn replied with a term I was never accused of before: "birther." I wondered what this term had to do with the online long form birth certificate being a laughably fake cut and paste job. I was never a birther. I was just a competent graphics professional. That didn't stop the accusations of racism and labeling me a birther.
The comments were coming in fast and furious, and I knew I didn't do conjecture or supposition in either video. I just relayed straight indisputable facts, and concluded with the obvious: it wasn't a copy of his birth certificate. But the comments weren't arguing the merits -- they were making claims upon my character. Finally I said enough, and closed off the comments. Then something fascinating happened: I wasn't getting hits. Now this was impossible... my first video was the second video on youtube on the subject; it was properly titled and labelled and it wasn't being visited. So I did an experiment: I didn't log into my youtube account, as if I were just visiting youtube, and did a keyword search. About 100 videos on the subject showed up, but not mine... and youtube even exhausted its search, meaning that no more videos with those keywords existed. But that wasn't true. Mine did. Youtube obviously hardwired their search engine to purposely miss my video.
Slowly, slowly, I came to grasp the bigger picture. The media and the message were being controlled. Much later I heard about Fox News killing the story at their end from the very day of the long form release, threatening their reporters with firings if they pursued this issue. And that was Fox News! Why would a major news outlet with dozens of graphics experts who knew what I knew, kill the story rather than investigate it? I thank Snowden for the answer to that question: the NSA had the dirt on key people who ran Fox News, and they were threatened. And they caved.
Now my two online videos exposing the fraud were receiving comments in support of Obama and accusing me of being a racist. I just replied with the facts. They in turn replied with a term I was never accused of before: "birther." I wondered what this term had to do with the online long form birth certificate being a laughably fake cut and paste job. I was never a birther. I was just a competent graphics professional. That didn't stop the accusations of racism and labeling me a birther.
The comments were coming in fast and furious, and I knew I didn't do conjecture or supposition in either video. I just relayed straight indisputable facts, and concluded with the obvious: it wasn't a copy of his birth certificate. But the comments weren't arguing the merits -- they were making claims upon my character. Finally I said enough, and closed off the comments. Then something fascinating happened: I wasn't getting hits. Now this was impossible... my first video was the second video on youtube on the subject; it was properly titled and labelled and it wasn't being visited. So I did an experiment: I didn't log into my youtube account, as if I were just visiting youtube, and did a keyword search. About 100 videos on the subject showed up, but not mine... and youtube even exhausted its search, meaning that no more videos with those keywords existed. But that wasn't true. Mine did. Youtube obviously hardwired their search engine to purposely miss my video.
Slowly, slowly, I came to grasp the bigger picture. The media and the message were being controlled. Much later I heard about Fox News killing the story at their end from the very day of the long form release, threatening their reporters with firings if they pursued this issue. And that was Fox News! Why would a major news outlet with dozens of graphics experts who knew what I knew, kill the story rather than investigate it? I thank Snowden for the answer to that question: the NSA had the dirt on key people who ran Fox News, and they were threatened. And they caved.